(function() { (function(){function b(g){this.t={};this.tick=function(h,m,f){var n=f!=void 0?f:(new Date).getTime();this.t[h]=[n,m];if(f==void 0)try{window.console.timeStamp("CSI/"+h)}catch(q){}};this.getStartTickTime=function(){return this.t.start[0]};this.tick("start",null,g)}var a;if(window.performance)var e=(a=window.performance.timing)&&a.responseStart;var p=e>0?new b(e):new b;window.jstiming={Timer:b,load:p};if(a){var c=a.navigationStart;c>0&&e>=c&&(window.jstiming.srt=e-c)}if(a){var d=window.jstiming.load; c>0&&e>=c&&(d.tick("_wtsrt",void 0,c),d.tick("wtsrt_","_wtsrt",e),d.tick("tbsd_","wtsrt_"))}try{a=null,window.chrome&&window.chrome.csi&&(a=Math.floor(window.chrome.csi().pageT),d&&c>0&&(d.tick("_tbnd",void 0,window.chrome.csi().startE),d.tick("tbnd_","_tbnd",c))),a==null&&window.gtbExternal&&(a=window.gtbExternal.pageT()),a==null&&window.external&&(a=window.external.pageT,d&&c>0&&(d.tick("_tbnd",void 0,window.external.startE),d.tick("tbnd_","_tbnd",c))),a&&(window.jstiming.pt=a)}catch(g){}})();window.tickAboveFold=function(b){var a=0;if(b.offsetParent){do a+=b.offsetTop;while(b=b.offsetParent)}b=a;b<=750&&window.jstiming.load.tick("aft")};var k=!1;function l(){k||(k=!0,window.jstiming.load.tick("firstScrollTime"))}window.addEventListener?window.addEventListener("scroll",l,!1):window.attachEvent("onscroll",l); })(); '; $bloggerarchive='
  • January 2006
  • February 2006
  • March 2006
  • April 2006
  • May 2006
  • June 2006
  • July 2006
  • August 2006
  • September 2006
  • October 2006
  • November 2006
  • December 2006
  • January 2007
  • February 2007
  • March 2007
  • April 2007
  • May 2007
  • June 2007
  • July 2007
  • August 2007
  • September 2007
  • October 2007
  • November 2007
  • December 2007
  • January 2008
  • February 2008
  • March 2008
  • April 2008
  • May 2008
  • June 2008
  • July 2008
  • August 2008
  • September 2008
  • October 2008
  • November 2008
  • December 2008
  • January 2009
  • February 2009
  • March 2009
  • April 2009
  • May 2009
  • June 2009
  • July 2009
  • August 2009
  • September 2009
  • October 2009
  • November 2009
  • December 2009
  • January 2010
  • February 2010
  • March 2010
  • April 2010
  • May 2010
  • '; ini_set("include_path", "/usr/www/users/dollarsa/"); include("inc/header.php"); ?>
    D and S Blog image



    Subscribe to Dollars & Sense magazine.

    Subscribe to the D&S blog»

    Recent articles related to the financial crisis.

    Tuesday, November 03, 2009

     

    Sit-in for Single-Payer in Pelosi's Office

    by Dollars and Sense

    Breaking news from the folks at the Mobilization for Health Care for All:

    CALL PELOSI NOW! (415) 556-4862 and (202) 225-0100
    There are 8 people sitting in RIGHT NOW in Nancy Pelosi's Office in San Francisco!

    They are not leaving until they get an answer to their demands! Their demands are that the Kucinich amendment MUST be in the health care bill that the House votes on, and that the House MUST vote on the Weiner amendment.

    Pelosi PROMISED the American people that she would ensure BOTH of the above would happen, and she has betrayed us by reneging on those promises!

    YOU can HELP! Call her office in SF at (415) 556-4862 and Washington, DC (202) 225-0100; demand that she talk with the people sitting in. Demand that she keep her promises and put Kucinich Amendment in bill and allow Floor vote on the Weiner Amendment!

    Burn up her phone lines people! This is NOT business as usual! This is FOR REAL - we can make a difference in the future of health care in this country!

    Labels: , , , ,

     

    Please consider donating to Dollars & Sense and/or subscribing to the magazine (both print and e-subscriptions now available!).
    11/03/2009 05:30:00 PM 0 comments

    Friday, October 30, 2009

     

    Next Wave of Health-Care Sit-Ins

    by Dollars and Sense

    The Mobilization for Health Care for All had its latest big wave of sit-ins for single-payer on Wednesday (and this wave is ongoing). Here's their report:

    Yesterday [Oct. 28th], the next wave of the Mobilization for Health Care for All began with great success. See below for a list of media coverage of the actions.

    In 11 cities across the country, hundreds of everyday Americans who want Medicare for All confronted the insurance companies and demanded that they redirect the money they're spending to control our democracy to pay for the care they deny to their members. Almost every company refused to even talk to us, and 37 people were arrested including doctor Matt Hendrickson at a Cigna office in Glendale, California. Dozens more - like the 30 people who blockaded the Blue Cross office in San Francisco for hours - sat in but weren't arrested. In Rhode Island, however, the protestors who joined cancer patient Robert Darling in occupying the UnitedHealthcare office won the first concessions of our campaign - a company representative agreed to give an answer to Robert about paying for his previous bone marrow transplant within 24 hours and to arrange a meeting for the group with the UnitedHealthcare CEO within a week! After 115 arrests in 18 cities, these companies are starting to feel the heat of our movement. And with more than 900 people now signed up to sit-in, this battle is just beginning.

    Today, the Mobilization continued in Louisville, Kentucky and Baltimore, Maryland. The brave folks in Louisville are in the 9th hour of their sit-in inside the Humana headquarters as we send out this email. Humana is trying to wait them out, but may are prepared to stay overnight if they have to.

    In Baltimore, four people were arrested at a CareFirst (Blue Cross) office including two doctors. One of those doctors, Margaret Flowers of the "Baucus 8," has withheld her name and is planning to stay in jail until the CEO of CareFirst, Chet Burrell, agrees to a public meeting with her.

    Please call Mr. Burrell immediately and regularly at 410-528-2222 to demand that he agree to meet publicly with Margaret.
    You can also email CareFirst by going to http://www.carefirst.com/email/html/ContactMediaRelations.html. Send the following message in your email:
    I am writing to urge CEO Chet Burrell to agree to a public meeting with Dr. Margaret Flowers who was arrested at the CareFirst office in Baltimore while demanding to meet with Mr. Burrell about CareFirst business practices. She is going to stay in jail until Mr. Burrell agrees to a public meeting with her. CareFirst must publicly account for the serious concerns that citizens have about your company's practices.

    Also, please donate generously today so we can be prepared to pay any bail that is set for Margaret's release. She decided to risk arrest and stay in jail despite a possible 6 month jail sentence for violating probation from her previous arrest in the fight for real health care reform - let's show her that we've got her back. Please donate today to support Margaret and post messages of support for her at our Facebook page (we'll read all messages to her over the phone when she calls from jail).

    The Mobilization continues in Philadelphia tomorrow, and in more cities across the country next week. Click here for updated lists of all the upcoming actions and info about how you can plug in and participate. The insurance companies, the politicians in their pockets, and even some of the corporate media apparently want our movement to go away. But it's just getting started and spreading across America. Let's show them we're not going anywhere and we won't stop until health care is a right for everyone in America.

    Thanks for everything you do.

    —Katie, Kevin, Kai, Julia, Lacy, and the Mobilization team

    Press Coverage from 10/28:


    San Francisco Chronicle

    South Florida Sun-Sentinel

    NJ.com (Star-Ledger / Trenton Times / Jersey Journal blog)

    projo.com (Providence Journal blog)

    Glendale News-Press

    National Public Radio, Topics


    Democracy Now

    Free Speech Radio News

    Huffington Post

    Institute for Public Accuracy

    Atlas Press Photo

    La Jornada (Mexico)

    OpEdNews (featured story about doctors, by Kevin Gosztola):

    OpEdNews (about Philadelphia rally)

    Bay Area Indymedia (quality article, good for reference):

    Press Coverage from 10/29:

    Southern Maryland Online

    Wave3.com

    WFPL News

    Labels: , , ,

     

    Please consider donating to Dollars & Sense and/or subscribing to the magazine (both print and e-subscriptions now available!).
    10/30/2009 03:00:00 PM 1 comments

    Sunday, December 14, 2008

     

    Dissenting Account of the Republic Settlement

    by Dollars and Sense

    An interesting dissenting view, from Darren Hutchinson of Dissenting Justice on the settlement between Bank of America and workers who staged a sit-in at Republic Windows and Doors in Chicago. (See our recently-posted article about the sit-in and settlement here; our January/February issue will include a comment by UMass-Boston economist Randy Albelda on the financial crisis and the shredded safety net.) The back-story about the company's political connections is particularly interesting. I think part of what is going on is that people are so unused to any kind of labor militancy that they were quick to take anything they could get. An Argentine-style takeover of the factory (with or without help from the state) would have been even better than state-supported safety-net provisions and retraining, no?.
    What (I Think) Progressives Should Have Done for Workers of Republic Windows and Doors

    A comment from a reader is the immediate reason for this blog entry. But I feel obligated to keep this subject "in play" because the mainstream media have failed to examine this issues surrounding Republic Windows and Doors and its former workers deeply and critically.

    In a comment on Dissenting Justice, reader "Brian" says:

    "While you point out some important reasons to continue the fight against irresponsible employers, if the UE union didn't take action fast, the Chicago workers would have been screwed. Hindsight is 20/20, but Christmas is coming, and these good folks in Illinois needed their paychecks. Since Bank of America was the easiest political target, these people will be having a merry Christmas. My question for you is, what should progressives have done to ensure that these folks got their due and that what should we do to ensure that Republic's owners get their's?"

    Well, Brian, first of all, the angle I have taken is not "hindsight." The very first article detailing the Iowa move came before Bank of America caved to political pressure. This article appeared in the Chicago Tribune. But holding that aside, here's what I would have rather seen happen.

    Better Analysis of the Bailout


    I agree that the bailout helps banks. A lot of those banks engaged in risky lending and other bad investment practices. In many ways one could even construe the bailout as a "handout" to banks. Previously, I analyzed the bailout from this perspective, and I stand by those arguments.

    But the bailout is also a tool of macroeconomic policy. Holding aside the bad behavior of lenders and consumers, pumping money into the nation's financial institutions can provide necessary liquidity to fuel economic activity, which is undeniably sluggish. The protestors acknowledged this aspect of the bailout, but they also distorted its purpose when they argued that participation in the bailout obligated Bank of America (or any other recipient of federal assistance) to "lend money on demand." Poor lending practices contributed greatly to the nation's poor economic conditions. Encouraging additional bad lending cannot fix this problem, but liberals nevertheless implied that Republic Windows and Doors was entitled to loan assistance simply because its creditor participated in the bailout. This is untrue. It is also pretty unwise as a matter banking policy.

    I also do not agree with your implied assertion that the "ends justify the means" because the workers now have money for Christmas. First, this does respond to the true problem -- that distressed workers and unemployed people need stronger emergency aid. Also, this argument shifts responsibility away from the culpable party: the management of Republic Windows and Doors.

    Getting to the True Problem: The Need for Emergency Aid

    A central problem of the bailout with respect to "Main Street" is that in many instances, banks will not (or should not) deliver relief to distressed individuals or companies at all (because of derogatory credit histories or a lack of income or revenue). Even when individuals qualify for credit, banks might not deliver assistance rapidly enough. Rather than distort the intent of the bailout by arguing that it mandates lending to anyone, progressives should have advocated that state officials deliver emergency relief and more sustained welfare assistance to needy individuals.

    The laid-off workers will need job training (potentially), health care, education, extended unemployment benefits, welfare payments, housing assistance, and other forms of relief. Beating up Bank of America does not give them these things. By contrast, emergency state aid could have provided them benefits by Christmas and beyond. If Illinois, a blue state and home to Obama/Lincoln, cannot provide rapid assistance to laid-off individuals in the face of intense national scrutiny, then we may as well retire all "hope" for "change" at the national level.

    Additionally, because the Left validated a public narrative which depicted Bank of America as the sole enemy of workers, politicians involved in the protests can now claim "victory" without working to ensure a more longterm package of benefits for these workers and others who have lost their jobs. Their work is now done. Jesse Jackson delivered 300 turkeys, but will he do more after Christmas?

    Strengthening the economic safety net is a matter of national and local importance. None of the politicians in this situation, however, publicly advocated a policy solution that focused on improving social welfare policy. Instead, they placed responsibility for solving the human dimensions of the recession on the bailout, which is principally designed to shape macroeconomic activity.

    Now that Bank of America has capitulated, progressives and the media are treating the workers as yesterday's news. Absent public scrutiny, it is unclear who will help them once they exhaust their remaining salary and benefits. The argument against Bank of America will no longer have persuasive force (barring some bizarre chain of events).

    Strange Silence Surrounding Republic Windows and Doors

    As I have stated before, the most troubling aspect of this situation is that progressive advocacy has permitted Republic Windows and Doors to discard its workers, restart its operations in another state, and escape any bad press or liability. But the company is the most culpable (probably the only culpable) party involved in this scenario. If the company can afford to restart its operations in Iowa, then it could have delayed that move and paid its workers the wages and benefits to which state and federal law entitled them. By ignoring the employer, however, progressives helped direct public scrutiny away from the only party that violated the rights of workers.

    According to scattered reports, the owners of the company seem well connected to the "Chicago machine." Mayor Daley helped them secure nearly $10 million dollars from the city to build a new factory, and his brother, who chairs JP Morgan Midwest, helped secure $400,000 in loans to pay the workers. Progressives could have pressured these known contacts to persuade the company to pay its workers. In other words, powerful officials connected to Republic Windows and Doors could have urged its managers to obey the law.

    Instead, progressives cheered as recently indicted Governor Blagojevich made a rash, unfair -- and probably illegal -- decision to ban Bank of America from transacting business with the State of Illinois. If this is how a progressive victory looks, then I can do without it.

    This is the full post; click here and scroll down for related earlier posts on Dissenting Justice.

    Labels: , , , , , ,

     

    Please consider donating to Dollars & Sense and/or subscribing to the magazine (both print and e-subscriptions now available!).
    12/14/2008 01:32:00 PM 0 comments

    Tuesday, December 09, 2008

     

    How to Get a New New Deal (John Nichols)

    by Dollars and Sense

    We noticed this in the Boston Metro, our subway paper ("world's largest circulation global newspaper" or something--it really is worldwide), by John Nichols of the Nation. We include the article in full because the Metro doesn't have permalinks (and it's a characteristically tiny article).

    Workers sit-down for a New Deal

    Much has been made about the prospect that Barack Obama's presidency might be a reprise of the New Deal era — due both to economic necessity and the President-elect's interventionist inclinations.

    But there will be no "new New Deal" if Americans simply look to Obama to lead them out of the domestic quagmire into which Bill Clinton and George Bush led the country —with a toxic blend of free-trade absolutism, banking deregulation and disdain for industrial policy.

    Just as Roosevelt needed mass movements and militancy as an excuse to talk Washington stalwarts into accepting radical shifts in the economic order, so Obama will need to be able to point to some turbulence at the grassroots.

    And so he may have it.

    After Bank of America—a $25-billion recipient of Bailout Czar Hank Paulson's "Wall Street First" largesse—cut off operating credit to Republic Windows and Doors, executives of the firm announced that they were shutting its factory in Chicago.

    Instead of going home to a dismal holiday season like hundreds of thousands of other working Americans who have fallen victim to the corporate "reduction-in-force" frenzy of recent weeks—which has seen suddenly-secure banks pocket their federal dollars rather than loosen up their credit—the Republic workers occupied the factory where many of them had worked for decades.

    Members of United Electrical Workers Local 1110, which represents 260 Republic workers, are conducting the contemporary equivalent of the 1930s sit-down strikes, which led to the rapid expansion of union recognition nationwide and empowered the Roosevelt administration to enact more equitable labor laws. And, just as in the thirties, they are objecting to policies that put banks ahead of workers; stickers worn by the UE sit-down strikers read: "You got bailed out, we got sold out."

    If the right history of this time is written, it will be said that the new New Deal began in Chicago—not just because of the city's rich record of labor struggle (from the Haymarket martyrs in the 19th century to the steel industry organizing of the 1930s) or Obama's Chicago ties—but because the workers there were the first to stand up by sitting down.

    John Nichols is a Washington correspondent for The Nation magazine.

    Labels: , , , ,

     

    Please consider donating to Dollars & Sense and/or subscribing to the magazine (both print and e-subscriptions now available!).
    12/09/2008 05:09:00 PM 0 comments