(function() { (function(){function b(g){this.t={};this.tick=function(h,m,f){var n=void 0!=f?f:(new Date).getTime();this.t[h]=[n,m];if(void 0==f)try{window.console.timeStamp("CSI/"+h)}catch(q){}};this.getStartTickTime=function(){return this.t.start[0]};this.tick("start",null,g)}var a;if(window.performance)var e=(a=window.performance.timing)&&a.responseStart;var p=0=c&&(window.jstiming.srt=e-c)}if(a){var d=window.jstiming.load; 0=c&&(d.tick("_wtsrt",void 0,c),d.tick("wtsrt_","_wtsrt",e),d.tick("tbsd_","wtsrt_"))}try{a=null,window.chrome&&window.chrome.csi&&(a=Math.floor(window.chrome.csi().pageT),d&&0=b&&window.jstiming.load.tick("aft")};var k=!1;function l(){k||(k=!0,window.jstiming.load.tick("firstScrollTime"))}window.addEventListener?window.addEventListener("scroll",l,!1):window.attachEvent("onscroll",l); })(); '; $bloggerarchive='
  • January 2006
  • February 2006
  • March 2006
  • April 2006
  • May 2006
  • June 2006
  • July 2006
  • August 2006
  • September 2006
  • October 2006
  • November 2006
  • December 2006
  • January 2007
  • February 2007
  • March 2007
  • April 2007
  • May 2007
  • June 2007
  • July 2007
  • August 2007
  • September 2007
  • October 2007
  • November 2007
  • December 2007
  • January 2008
  • February 2008
  • March 2008
  • April 2008
  • May 2008
  • June 2008
  • July 2008
  • August 2008
  • September 2008
  • October 2008
  • November 2008
  • December 2008
  • January 2009
  • February 2009
  • March 2009
  • April 2009
  • May 2009
  • June 2009
  • July 2009
  • August 2009
  • September 2009
  • October 2009
  • November 2009
  • December 2009
  • January 2010
  • February 2010
  • March 2010
  • April 2010
  • May 2010
  • '; ini_set("include_path", "/usr/www/users/dollarsa/"); include("inc/header.php"); ?>
    D and S Blog image



    Subscribe to Dollars & Sense magazine.

    Subscribe to the D&S blog»

    Recent articles related to the financial crisis.

    Wednesday, November 21, 2007

     

    Payday Loans, Tongue out of Cheek

    by Ben Greenberg

    In response to my post about the satirical Predatory Lending Association website, yesterday an anonymous commenter wrote the following:
    This site you are trying to get people to take notice of is a fake! The fact that you are promoting a fake site that is complete satire makes you as bad as the scum that created the site to fight dirty against this industry! I have had my ass saved by the occasional payday loan and it is a respectable service for those that use it wisely. The idiots that missuse it and then cry about it do so on their own. There will always be the borrower who is just trying to score their next bag of weed or get money to drink on, but what about the person that is about to have a couple of small checks hit the bank and because of an accounting error they made by accident, their bank is going to charge them $34 for each check and then demand that they cover this fee by the next day? (What’s the APR on that 1 day loan?) What about the senior on welfare that needs a prescription not covered by their Medicare? What about the working single mother that is about to have her electric shut off in the middle of December? There are reasons that the service serves people for the good. There are also people that will abuse the system and get themselves in debt. People that don’t think. But that doesn’t mean that we need our government to think for everybody! Don't take away what for some is the only option available to them! In a free country, people are free to do good and bad. Free to do smart things and stupid things. That is the price of freedom. The government needs to keep their noses out of the business of American people!
    Since I didn't have time to reply yesterday, I'm going to post here rather than back in the comments.

    If we have an economy in which people are on the edge in the way anonymous describes, (a) why is that, and what can we do to change that? (b) in the meantime, can we have places people can turn for short-term financial help that don't charge such exorbitant interest and risk putting people in debt?

    Dollars & Sense
    recently ran an article by Howard Karger, who has written a book about pay day loans and other businesses that have predatory relationships with low-income or heavily indebted consumers, e.g., pawnshops, check-cashers, tax refund lenders, rent-to-own stores, and "buy-here/pay-here" used car lots.

    In his article, Karger discussed some of the current research about these businesses in what he calls the "fringe economy."
    Southwest Center for Economic Integrity found that 67% of borrowers used their loans for general non-emergency bills. The Center for Responsible Lending found that 66% of borrowers initiate five or more loans a year, and 31% take out twelve or more loans yearly. Over 90% of payday loans go to borrowers with five or more loans a year. Customers who take out 13 or more loans a year account for over half of payday lenders' total revenues.
    The Center for Responsible Lending has found that "ninety-nine percent of payday loans are flipped" rather than paid back* and "ninety percent of payday lending revenues are based on fees stripped from trapped borrowers." In other words, the industry is based on people getting caught in widening spirals of debt and not on people like anonymous who only need an "occasional payday loan" and can catch up at the next check.

    (And who do you think payday loan companies are targeting especially? African Americans and military families.)

    But anonymous brings up an important point: the need for some alternative to payday loans. In the long term: an economy in which so many people aren't on the edge; in the short term: some kind of micro-lending system that isn't so usurious (through community-supported credit unions, maybe?). Karger is very good, by the way, about not wanting to simply shut down payday loan businesses without offering an alternative; to do so would be to make people vulnerable to real loan sharks.

    ~
    *Flipping the loan means renewing it for a large fee without being able to pay down the principal.

    Labels: , , , , , , ,

     

    Please consider donating to Dollars & Sense and/or subscribing to the magazine (both print and e-subscriptions now available!).
    11/21/2007 11:35:00 AM 5 comments

    Sunday, November 18, 2007

     

    Naomi Klein at Firedoglake

    by Ben Greenberg

    Jacket CoverThe discussion appears to be over, but earlier today Naomi Klein was fielding questions about her new book at the weekly Firedoglake book salon.

    What is the shock doctrine? Klein explains:
    I started researching the free market's dependence on the power of shock four years ago, during the early days of the occupation of Iraq. I reported from Baghdad on Washington's failed attempts to follow "shock and awe" with shock therapy - mass privatisation, complete free trade, a 15% flat tax, a dramatically downsized government. Afterwards I travelled to Sri Lanka, several months after the devastating 2004 tsunami, and witnessed another version of the same manoeuvre: foreign investors and international lenders had teamed up to use the atmosphere of panic to hand the entire beautiful coastline over to entrepreneurs who quickly built large resorts, blocking hundreds of thousands of fishing people from rebuilding their villages. By the time Hurricane Katrina hit New Orleans, it was clear that this was now the preferred method of advancing corporate goals: using moments of collective trauma to engage in radical social and economic engineering.

    Most people who survive a disaster want the opposite of a clean slate: they want to salvage whatever they can and begin repairing what was not destroyed. "When I rebuild the city I feel like I'm rebuilding myself," said Cassandra Andrews, a resident of New Orleans' heavily damaged Lower Ninth Ward, as she cleared away debris after the storm. But disaster capitalists have no interest in repairing what once was. In Iraq, Sri Lanka and New Orleans, the process deceptively called "reconstruction" began with finishing the job of the original disaster by erasing what was left of the public sphere.
    We haven't been using Klein's terminology, but disaster capitalism should be a familiar concept to readers of Dollars & Sense. In "Fisherfolk Out, Tourists In" (July/August 2005), for example, Vasuki Nesiah wrote:
    From Thailand to Sri Lanka, the tourist industry saw the tsunami through dollar signs. The governments concerned were on board from the outset, quickly planning massive subsidies for the tourism industry in ways that suggest the most adverse distributive impact. Infrastructure development will be even further skewed to cater to the industry rather than to the needs of local communities. Within weeks of the tsunami, the Alliance for the Protection of National Resources and Human Rights, a Sri Lankan advocacy group, expressed concern that "the developing situation is disastrous, more disastrous than the tsunami itself, if it is possible for anything to be worse than that." ...

    Proposals announced by TAFREN [Task Force for Rebuilding the Nation] and by various government officials call for the building of multi-lane highways and the wholesale displacement of entire villages from the coast. Coastal lands are to be sliced up into designated buffer zones and tourism zones. The government is preventing those fishing families who wish to do so from rebuilding their homes on the coast, ostensibly because of the risk of future natural disasters; at the same time, it's encouraging the opening of both new and rebuilt beachfront tourist hotels.

    The plans are essentially roadmaps for multinational hotel chains, telecom companies, and the like to cater to the tourism industry. Small-scale fishing operations by individual proprietors will become more difficult to sustain as access to the beach becomes increasingly privatized and fishing conglomerates move in. The environmental deregulation proposed in the PRSP will open the door to even more untrammeled exploitation of natural resources. None of the reconstruction planning is being channeled through decision-making processes that are accountable or participatory. Ultimately, it looks like reconstruction will be determined by the deadly combination of a rapacious private sector and government graft: human tragedy becomes a commercial opportunity, tsunami aid a business venture.

    Not unpredictably, even the subsidies planned for the tourism industry in the wake of the tsunami are going to the hotel owners and big tour operators, not to the porters and cleaning women who were casual employees in hotels. Many of the local residents who were proprietors or workers in smaller tourism-related businesses, now unemployed, are not classified as tsunami-affected, so they are denied even the meager compensation they should be entitled to. The situation is much worse for the vast informal sector of sex workers, souvenir sellers, and others whose livelihood depended on the tourism industry. If the tsunami highlighted the acute vulnerability that accompanies financial dependence on the industry, the tsunami reconstruction plans look set to exacerbate this vulnerability even further.
    And I heard similar analysis from local African American activists along the Gulf Coast of Mississippi, following Hurricane Katrina. When I interviewed Derrick Evans of Turkey Creek Community Initiatives (March/April 2006), he said:
    [W]hat you'll find is that the unresolved problems pertaining to any one of those issues can be overlain on a map: that the lowest-lying land is typically where black folks, generations ago, would have acquired their land; where they would have settled and developed their communities, which would have been the least disturbed by 20th-century infrastructure; and that now, in the wake of a "Mississippi miracle"--the economic revitalization of the coast, for example, the advent of dockside casinos--would be the most ripe or prime for redevelopment.

    Today, you've got casino- and tourism-driven feudalism, coupled with militarism, constituting much of the local economy. Katrina has probably raised the cachet of the casinos and the military bases even more as the two main mules that are gonna pull us out of this mud. Government contracts for shipbuilding; bigger, wider roads and highways for trucking. Deeper, wider, dredged out shipping lanes for shipping; free trade agreements. Bigger and better casinos with more bells and whistles. More of the same is the economic forecast, because they can't imagine anything else.
    David Bacon, writing in this year's Annual Labor Issue, sees similar forces at play in Iraq.

    President Bush says he wants democracy, yet he will not accept the one political demand that unites Iraqis above all others. They want the country's oil (and its electrical power stations, ports, and other key facilities) to remain in public hands.

    The fact that Iraqi unions are the strongest voice demanding this makes them anathema. Selling the oil off to large corporations is far more important to the Bush administration than a paper commitment to the democratic process....

    The occupation has always had an economic agenda. In 2003 and 2004 occupation czar Paul Bremer published lists in Baghdad newspapers of the public enterprises he intended to auction off. Arab labor leader Hacene Djemam bitterly observed, "War makes privatization easy: first you destroy society; then you let the corporations rebuild it."

    The Bush administration won't leave Iraq in part because the economic agenda is still insecure.
    Perhaps the quickest way to understand how shock plays into all of this is to watch the short film based on Klein's book.



    One Firedoglake commenter asked Klein,
    Isn’t shock a funciton of any visionary change, regardless of whether it is left or right? Mao & Pol Pot come to mind. Why, then, is it disaster capitalism rather than disaster transformationalism?
    Klein replied:
    I wrote this book because the far left has been held accountable for the crimes and abuses required to impose its utopian, year-zero fantasies. The far right has not. And when criminals are not held accountable for their crimes, they re-offend. It’s worth remembering that Paul Bremer was Kissinger’s right hand man during the coup in Chile in 1973.
    In today's discussion, Klein emphasized nonetheless that market forces are not all powerful and that, in fact, we are at an important turning point.
    The so-called “free market” is in crisis today - we see it with sub-prime, a s well as with the massive disillusionment with the Bush Administration. Even Greenspan warns in his book that people are losing faith in market fundamentalism.

    This is a moment for the left/progressives to propose our vision with real confidence and without apologies. We shouldn’t be afraid to be angry at grotesque injustice, and we need to stop being apologetic about believing in universal human rights and universal health care.

    Labels: , , , , , , , , , , ,

     

    Please consider donating to Dollars & Sense and/or subscribing to the magazine (both print and e-subscriptions now available!).
    11/18/2007 08:10:00 PM 0 comments

    Friday, November 16, 2007

     

    In Mississippi, Poor Lag in Hurricane Aid

    by Dollars and Sense

    This is in today's New York Times:
    By LESLIE EATON
    Published: November 16, 2007

    GULFPORT, Miss., Nov. 14 — Like the other Gulf Coast states battered by Hurricane Katrina, Mississippi was required by Congress to spend half of its billions in federal grant money to help low-income citizens trying to recover from the storm.

    But so far, the state has spent $1.7 billion in federal money on programs that have mostly benefited relatively affluent residents and big businesses. The money has gone to compensate many middle- and upper-income homeowners, to aid utility companies whose equipment was damaged and to prop up the state’s insurance system. Read more...
    For Dollars & Sense's coverage of Katrina and its aftermath, see our special March/April 2006 issue on Katrina, and also The KatrinaRitaVille Express, in our September/October 2007 issue. 

    Please consider donating to Dollars & Sense and/or subscribing to the magazine (both print and e-subscriptions now available!).
    11/16/2007 03:30:00 PM 0 comments

     

    Support Gulf Coast Housing Recovery Act of 2007 S. 1668

    by Dollars and Sense

    We received this from Amelie Ratliff of Mass Action for the Gulf Coast:

    Finally, there's a bill in Congress that would help some of the hardest hit Katrina survivors come back home. Unfortunately, it is about to die because some members of the Senate think it's fine for certain New Orleanians— specifically those who are Black and poor—to be shut out of the city.

    I just called on my senators to support the Gulf Coast Housing Recovery Act of 2007 (S. 1668). It would re-open desperately needed housing and make sure there is no loss of affordable public housing in New Orleans. Please join me by contacting your senators and check out powerful videos about the housing situation in New Orleans created by Brave New Foundation and as part of the Voices from the Gulf Project. It takes just a moment:

    http://www.colorofchange.org/s1668/?id=1834-142331

    Saving Affordable Housing in New Orleans

    New Orleans public housing residents have been fighting for over two years to return to apartments that were minimally damaged by the storm. But the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) has shut them out, because it wants to demolish most of the available public housing units—and replace them with far fewer mixed-income housing.[1] The vast majority of the most affordable public housing units, pushing thousands of mostly Black low-income residents out of the city.

    S.1668 honors the right to return of all New Orleans public housing residents. It requires the re-opening of at least 3,000 public housing units and ensures that there is no net loss of units available and affordable to public housing residents. It also designates $1.7 billion for rental housing assistance and earmarks millions for community development programs, which will benefit an even larger segment of the lower income population. But the bill is in danger of dying -- because some senators are opposed to preserving affordable public housing.

    It's hard to know what motivates each senator, but it's an open secret that many folks have a desire to see a richer and Whiter post-Katrina New Orleans, and many of them have a great deal of political influence. Senators like David Vitter (La.) and Richard Shelby (Al.) appear to be playing to those interests by standing in the way of this legislation, and others are following their lead. If they win, it will be yet another instance of the federal government abandoning those most vulnerable during and after Katrina.

    The Gulf Coast needs a housing policy that welcomes all citizens home, especially those who need the most help coming home. Senate bill 1668 is an opportunity to do that. Please join us in demanding that your senator support the bill.

    http://www.colorofchange.org/s1668/?id=1834-142331

    Thanks.

    Labels: , , , , , , ,

     

    Please consider donating to Dollars & Sense and/or subscribing to the magazine (both print and e-subscriptions now available!).
    11/16/2007 03:12:00 PM 0 comments

    Wednesday, November 14, 2007

     

    Online Resource of the Day

    by Ben Greenberg

    Dollars & Sense readers and supporters will find the PLA website most informative.

    The Predatory Lending Association mission: To help predatory lenders extract maximum profit from the working poor and retired poor with payday loans.

    The predatory lending industry: In the last 10 years, payday loan stores have gone from being illegal to outnumbering Starbucks™ coffee shops in many states.

    Predatory LendingMaximum profit: In 2006, American families spent one in seven of their take home dollars on debt payments1. The Predatory Lending Association is the only organization dedicated to helping you capture these dollars.

    Become a member of the Predatory Lending Association

    The Predatory Lending Association is not related in any way to the Association of Predatory Home Lenders (APHL), which focuses on the home mortgage industry. And while we are partners, we remain separate from the Society for Credit Card Fee Maximization (SCCFM), the Association of Predatory Money Managers (APMM), and the Society of Predatory Mutual Funds (SPMF).

    The PLA website is chock full of resources, including its Military Loan Finder , Working Poor Finder, and Racial Profiling Tools.

    (via P6)

    Labels: , , ,

     

    Please consider donating to Dollars & Sense and/or subscribing to the magazine (both print and e-subscriptions now available!).
    11/14/2007 08:43:00 AM 3 comments

    Friday, November 09, 2007

     

    Sub-Prime Primer

    by Ben Greenberg


    Via Darkstar.

     

    Please consider donating to Dollars & Sense and/or subscribing to the magazine (both print and e-subscriptions now available!).
    11/09/2007 01:37:00 AM 0 comments