![]() Subscribe to Dollars & Sense magazine. Recent articles related to the financial crisis. Central Bankers, et al: Supply and, uh, What?This posting is from D&S collective member and frequent blogger Larry Peterson. To see more of his posts, click here.Well, the verdict from the markets is in, and they rejected the new Treasury plan to recpitalize the banking system with almost as much enthusiasm as certain members of the House of Representatves rejected the first Treasury plan in late September. As befits a country with a disgraceful healthcare system, the soggy plaster hurriedly applied by the financial mandarins was washed away by a torrent of bloodletting on Wall Street today, with US indices giving up almost all the enormous gains they made after the unprecedented Central Bank interventions at the weekend. And this in spite of a halving of the cost of credit default insurance, and tentative signs of improvement in the all-important interbank and even commercial paper markets. The reason? A poor monthly retail sales report confirmed evidence from the just published Federal Reserve Beige Book on the health of the economy, and the indications are quite poor. As a consequence, non-financial stocks, which never really got going anyway after the announcement of the plan, fell sharply, particularly in cyclical industries and consumer goods. The (quite sensible) sentiment seems to be: all the corporate liquidity in the world (assuming it becomes truly and safely available) won't help sell to consumers who have nothing to pay for products and services anyway, as they are up to their necks in debt, and facing the prospect of swingeing job cuts, recession and--ahem--paying off the still incalculable debt of the banks anyway. And that goes for overseas consumers, too: the recent export boom, which accounted for a vast part of the otherwise inexplicable growth of the economy for the first half of the year, is bound to tail off, as trading partners find themselves, as the Europeans did, swiftly caught up in recession, or have to concentrate on shoring up domestic economies, as China and other countries still experiencing growth may have to do. Especially if the US dollar retains its position as every speculator's security blanket in time of turmoil. So bad times are on the way. What to do? Well, once Obama is elected (I have no doubt that he will humiliate the hapless McCain and his pathetic sidekick--and I wouldn't be surprised if Obama announces the outline of a semi-ambitious economic program during the presidential debate tonight, in order to consign the economically illiterate McCain to Dole-like irrelevance in the waning days of the election season), and even before, we must be on his case: we need to pressure him to focus oin the demand-side of the economy, replacing the rot of increasing consumer-indebtedness from the outsourcing of good jobs and speculative asset-bubbles that engender increasingly jobless recoveries with public works programs of huge proportions. We can't let him, as was the case with our current economic bureacrats, make the mistake that a crisis of this nature can be solved merely by adding to one side of the equation. And these public works programs must be focused on productive endevors, of which there is no shortage: a single-payer healtcare system, serious, even drastic, environmental reform, and the end to global military adventures: we can't squander the money on favoring the housing sector, or trying to subsidize heavy polluters. But it's not going to be easy. So get out there, or be prepared to feel some serious pain, sucker. It's that simple. Labels: financial crisis, john mccain, Larry Peterson, Obama, recession, stock market
Comments:
There's no evidence yet that Obama is willing to hold the Obama campaign's national finance chair, Penny Pritzker, accountable for her role, as a member of the Superior Bank board, in creating the sub-prime mortgage crisis.
And if you think that a Democratic Clinton Administration-type low-wage/ service industry jobs-creation program, based on tax exemptions for "small businesses" who hire non-unionized workers will make any dent in the current unemployment/under-consumption crisis of U.S. imperialism, I think you're deceiving yourself. Also, by cutting federal income taxes on the predominantly white upper-middle-class folks who earn between $60,000 and $250,000 per year while not cutting the Pentagon's budget by 90 percent (to reflect the desire of the U.S. pacifists who also are against Obama's plan to send more troops to Afghanistan), an Obama administration is not likely to have funds to either create a New Deal type-public works federal job program, provide rent relief for U.S. tenants or even set up a free health care system for all U.S. citizens. In addition, as long as extremely wealthy "non-profit" universities like Harvard and billionaire foundations like the Ford Foundation continue to be exempt from paying taxes at the same rate as the "for-profit" corporations, both U.S. municipalities like Boston, U.S. state governments and the U.S. federal government will lack the revenues needed to end the current U.S. economic crisis--especially since (along with Wal-Mart's)the growing, tax-exempt U.S. "non-profit" sector (which includes wealthy hospital/health care "non-profits" as well)has become a much more significant factor in the U.S. economy since the 1980s.
I have no illusions about Obama (or the Democrats, for that matter): I have never supported his candidacy in any way. I never supported Clinton either, or believed in his phony populism. All I am saying is that Obama will be the president-elect, and the Democrats will take both houses, quite possible with a majority in the Senate large enough to override a filibuster. That beig the case, we must pressure him and Congress as much as we can to achieve change that will prevent the pain that will almost certainly fall on our shoulders if we leave Obama and Co. to their own devices. I hope this clarifies things. Thanks for the comment.
Post a Comment
Larry Peterson << Home |