Bailedout Cash for Acquisition, Not Loans

by Dollars and Sense

Joe Nocera, New York Times business columnist, has a particularly interesting piece today. We all suspect that the money being injected by the Treasury Department in order to recapitalize banks is more likely to fund acquisitions than to ease the credit crisis by getting banks to lend again. In fact, we suspect that was part of the plan all along--to encourage (further) consolidation in the banking industry. Nocera helps confirm these suspicions, first by pointing us to the fine print in the bailout bill, which gives a tax break to banks that acquire other banks:

In fact, Treasury wants banks to acquire each other and is using its power to inject capital to force a new and wrenching round of bank consolidation. As Mark Landler reported in The New York Times earlier this week, "the government wants not only to stabilize the industry, but also to reshape it." Now they tell us.

Indeed, Mr. Landler’s story noted that Treasury would even funnel some of the bailout money to help banks buy other banks. And, in an almost unnoticed move, it recently put in place a new tax break, worth billions to the banking industry, that has only one purpose: to encourage bank mergers. As a tax expert, Robert Willens, put it: "It couldn’t be clearer if they had taken out an ad."

Nocera also managed to listen in on an employee-only phone conference over at JPMorgan-Chase, in which an executive tipped his hand on how the $25 billion injection the bank just took might be used. When someone asked the obvious question: "Chase recently received $25 billion in federal funding. What effect will that have on the business side and will it change our strategic lending policy?", here's how the executive responded:

"Twenty-five billion dollars is obviously going to help the folks who are struggling more than Chase," he began. "What we do think it will help us do is perhaps be a little bit more active on the acquisition side or opportunistic side for some banks who are still struggling. And I would not assume that we are done on the acquisition side just because of the Washington Mutual and Bear Stearns mergers. I think there are going to be some great opportunities for us to grow in this environment, and I think we have an opportunity to use that $25 billion in that way and obviously depending on whether recession turns into depression or what happens in the future, you know, we have that as a backstop."

Joe the journalist observes:

Read that answer as many times as you want — you are not going to find a single word in there about making loans to help the American economy. On the contrary: at another point in the conference call, the same executive (who I'm not naming because he didn’t know I would be listening in) explained that "loan dollars are down significantly." He added, "We would think that loan volume will continue to go down as we continue to tighten credit to fully reflect the high cost of pricing on the loan side." In other words JPMorgan has no intention of turning on the lending spigot.

It is starting to appear as if one of Treasury's key rationales for the recapitalization program — namely, that it will cause banks to start lending again — is a fig leaf, Treasury's version of the weapons of mass destruction.

Read the full article.

Labels: bailout, financial crisis, Joe Nocera, JP Morgan Chase, recapitalization

 

Please consider donating to Dollars & Sense and/or subscribing to the magazine (both print and e-subscriptions now available!).
10/25/2008 06:03:00 PM