(function() { (function(){function b(g){this.t={};this.tick=function(h,m,f){var n=void 0!=f?f:(new Date).getTime();this.t[h]=[n,m];if(void 0==f)try{window.console.timeStamp("CSI/"+h)}catch(q){}};this.getStartTickTime=function(){return this.t.start[0]};this.tick("start",null,g)}var a;if(window.performance)var e=(a=window.performance.timing)&&a.responseStart;var p=0=c&&(window.jstiming.srt=e-c)}if(a){var d=window.jstiming.load; 0=c&&(d.tick("_wtsrt",void 0,c),d.tick("wtsrt_","_wtsrt",e),d.tick("tbsd_","wtsrt_"))}try{a=null,window.chrome&&window.chrome.csi&&(a=Math.floor(window.chrome.csi().pageT),d&&0=b&&window.jstiming.load.tick("aft")};var k=!1;function l(){k||(k=!0,window.jstiming.load.tick("firstScrollTime"))}window.addEventListener?window.addEventListener("scroll",l,!1):window.attachEvent("onscroll",l); })(); '; $bloggerarchive='
  • January 2006
  • February 2006
  • March 2006
  • April 2006
  • May 2006
  • June 2006
  • July 2006
  • August 2006
  • September 2006
  • October 2006
  • November 2006
  • December 2006
  • January 2007
  • February 2007
  • March 2007
  • April 2007
  • May 2007
  • June 2007
  • July 2007
  • August 2007
  • September 2007
  • October 2007
  • November 2007
  • December 2007
  • January 2008
  • February 2008
  • March 2008
  • April 2008
  • May 2008
  • June 2008
  • July 2008
  • August 2008
  • September 2008
  • October 2008
  • November 2008
  • December 2008
  • January 2009
  • February 2009
  • March 2009
  • April 2009
  • May 2009
  • June 2009
  • July 2009
  • August 2009
  • September 2009
  • October 2009
  • November 2009
  • December 2009
  • January 2010
  • February 2010
  • March 2010
  • April 2010
  • May 2010
  • '; ini_set("include_path", "/usr/www/users/dollarsa/"); include("inc/header.php"); ?>
    D and S Blog image



    Subscribe to Dollars & Sense magazine.

    Subscribe to the D&S blog»

    Recent articles related to the financial crisis.

    Thursday, June 05, 2008

     

    Ed McMahon May Lose Beverly Hills Home

    by Dollars and Sense

    From yesterday's Wall Street Journal; hat tip to Doug Henwood of the Left Business Observer and lbo-talk.

    By JAMES R. HAGERTY and GLENN R. SIMPSON

    Ed McMahon, the longtime sidekick to television star Johnny Carson,
    faces the possible loss of his Beverly Hills home to a foreclosure
    action initiated by a unit of Countrywide Financial Corp.

    Howard Bragman, a spokesman for Mr. McMahon, said late Tuesday that
    his client is having "very fruitful discussions" with the lender and
    hopes to find a resolution. It isn't clear whether that would allow
    the 85-year-old Mr. McMahon and his wife, Pamela, to remain in the
    six-bedroom home.

    A Countrywide spokeswoman said the lender couldn't comment in such
    cases "due to privacy issues."

    Mr. McMahon, a jovial fixture of American television for decades, is
    one of the most prominent people caught up in a wave of mortgage
    defaults that has devastated low-income areas, suburbia and even a
    few posh gated communities, such as the one where the McMahons live.
    U.S. Rep. Laura Richardson, a California Democrat, recently lost a
    home in Sacramento to a foreclosure. Rep. Richardson didn't respond
    to requests for comment.

    ReconTrust, a unit of mortgage lender Countrywide Financial, on Feb.
    28 filed a notice of default on a $4.8 million Countrywide loan
    backed by Mr. McMahon's home. The notice was filed with the Los
    Angeles County Recorder's Office but hasn't previously come to light.
    According to the filing, Mr. McMahon was then about $644,000 in
    arrears on the loan. It isn't clear whether Countrywide still owns
    the loan or is acting on behalf of investors who acquired it. Public
    records also show that Mr. McMahon had a separate home-equity line of
    credit from Countrywide of up to $300,000 secured by the same house.

    Mr. McMahon's home has been on the market for about two years, his
    real-estate agent Alex Davis said. Mr. Davis said the price had been
    reduced, but he couldn't immediately provide details. The Christie's
    Great Estates Web site, which includes homes listed by Mr. Davis,
    lists the asking price at $5.75 million and says it has a canyon view
    and a master-bedroom suite with his and her bathrooms.

    Mr. McMahon broke his neck in a fall about 18 months ago and hasn't
    been able to work, Mr. Bragman said. That health problem, along with
    the weak housing market and economy, has forced Mr. McMahon into
    foreclosure proceedings, Mr. Bragman said.

    The McMahons "understand that they are in the same situation as
    hundreds of thousands of other hard-working Americans, and their
    hearts go out to them," Mr. Bragman said.

    It isn't inevitable that the McMahons will lose their home to
    foreclosure. Lenders often ease terms on loans or provide more time
    for borrowers to catch up. Lenders also sometimes agree to accept
    less than the full amount due on the loan if the borrower can find a
    buyer for the home.

    Labels: , ,

     

    Please consider donating to Dollars & Sense and/or subscribing to the magazine (both print and e-subscriptions now available!).
    6/05/2008 11:00:00 AM

    Comments:
    can someone please tell us how many other mansions eddie owns? what are they worth? where are they located? What does an 80 year old man need a $6 million dollar mansion for? Wouldn't a 1500-2500 square foot condo or townhome be more appropriate for someone like him. Why should we feel sorry for someone losing a $6 million dollar mansion when there are millions of people losing their simple homes while wondering what to do with their kids food, education, and shelter, paying a bigger price in gas simply to get to work to pay for the bills and avoid not only foreclosure but bankruptcy as well.
     
    In response to the comments: I don't have any info about Ed McMahon's holdings. But the commenter obviously doesn't understand the needs of the rich. ;) I am about to post another blog entry that helps illustrate those needs in more detail--this example will be a little clearer, because instead of just viewing the rich in isolation in their own habitat, we view them as they are taking over the habitat of the non-rich.
     
    Post a Comment



    << Home