(function() { (function(){function b(g){this.t={};this.tick=function(h,m,f){var n=void 0!=f?f:(new Date).getTime();this.t[h]=[n,m];if(void 0==f)try{window.console.timeStamp("CSI/"+h)}catch(q){}};this.getStartTickTime=function(){return this.t.start[0]};this.tick("start",null,g)}var a;if(window.performance)var e=(a=window.performance.timing)&&a.responseStart;var p=0=c&&(window.jstiming.srt=e-c)}if(a){var d=window.jstiming.load; 0=c&&(d.tick("_wtsrt",void 0,c),d.tick("wtsrt_","_wtsrt",e),d.tick("tbsd_","wtsrt_"))}try{a=null,window.chrome&&window.chrome.csi&&(a=Math.floor(window.chrome.csi().pageT),d&&0=b&&window.jstiming.load.tick("aft")};var k=!1;function l(){k||(k=!0,window.jstiming.load.tick("firstScrollTime"))}window.addEventListener?window.addEventListener("scroll",l,!1):window.attachEvent("onscroll",l); })(); '; $bloggerarchive='
  • January 2006
  • February 2006
  • March 2006
  • April 2006
  • May 2006
  • June 2006
  • July 2006
  • August 2006
  • September 2006
  • October 2006
  • November 2006
  • December 2006
  • January 2007
  • February 2007
  • March 2007
  • April 2007
  • May 2007
  • June 2007
  • July 2007
  • August 2007
  • September 2007
  • October 2007
  • November 2007
  • December 2007
  • January 2008
  • February 2008
  • March 2008
  • April 2008
  • May 2008
  • June 2008
  • July 2008
  • August 2008
  • September 2008
  • October 2008
  • November 2008
  • December 2008
  • January 2009
  • February 2009
  • March 2009
  • April 2009
  • May 2009
  • June 2009
  • July 2009
  • August 2009
  • September 2009
  • October 2009
  • November 2009
  • December 2009
  • January 2010
  • February 2010
  • March 2010
  • April 2010
  • May 2010
  • '; ini_set("include_path", "/usr/www/users/dollarsa/"); include("inc/header.php"); ?>
    D and S Blog image



    Subscribe to Dollars & Sense magazine.

    Subscribe to the D&S blog»

    Recent articles related to the financial crisis.

    Wednesday, January 23, 2008

     

    Bush tax rebate: not effective, not fair

    by Dollars and Sense

    This from the Economic Policy Institute:

    With an economic slowdown looming, the Bush administration has proposed a $100 billion tax rebate as part of an overall stimulus package for the slowing U.S. economy. But 70% of the rebate would go to the top 40% of earners and would exclude most low-income families, who are most in need and most likely to spend the money immediately. This week's Economic Snapshot examines the flawed proposal. 

    Please consider donating to Dollars & Sense and/or subscribing to the magazine (both print and e-subscriptions now available!).
    1/23/2008 01:19:00 PM

    Comments:
    No tax rebate will be fair to everyone. Lets be honest, those in the lowest bracket who pay no income taxes should not get a rebate. They already have built in incentives like the earned income credit etc... that is why they will not be part of this rebate.

    Also its not fair to other people at the high end either... Lets say your AGI is $85,000 a year.. you basically get phased out of the entire rebate. Now having an AGI of $85,000 is a ton of money if you live in Arkansas (no offense to my Razorback fans) but its nothing if you happen to live in Manhattan.

    The real problem in this country is that both the extreme poor and the extreme rich can "beat" the system. The poor usually collect unemployment, welfare and free healthcare while at the same time they have jobs that pay them "under the table" and do not pay a dime in taxes. The extreme rich on the other hand can afford to pay hundreds of thousands of dollars to their lawyers and accountants to "shelter" their millions from taxes.

    The real tax burden then falls on the middle class, those of us who work hard, have steady jobs, pay our bills and mortgages and watch Uncle Sam reach into our pockets every week. We pay the lions share of the taxes in this country and I believe its fair for us to receive the most benefit.

    My problem is that these rebates never take into account cost of living. I never understand how the government can use a specific dollar amount to justify certain cutoffs and limitations. The quality of life of someone making $60,000 a year in Arkansas is much better than that same person living in New York, in fact the same quality of life in Manhatatn would cost almost $135,000. These rebates and the entire "stimulus plan" should focus on improving Americans quality of life, not just giving money to the middle class so they can spend it on the newest iPod.

    Oh and if you think I'm nuts about the Cost of Living in NY vs Arkansas... see the link below

    http://cgi.money.cnn.com/tools/costofliving/costofliving.html?step=result¤t_salary=60000&fromStateMenu=AR&from_city=Little+Rock-N+Little+Rock+AR&toStateMenu=NY&to_city=New+York+%28Manhattan%29+NY&x=53&y=14
     
    I completely agree --- the tax rebate definitely is not "fair" and adds another $250 billion to our U.S. debt ---- what a waste!! Our country is going to Hell!
     
    Post a Comment



    << Home